Schools are being urged to go back to ‘chalk and talk’ teaching that was once widespread in Britain – in order to reproduce the success the traditional methods now have in China. Education Minister Nick Gibb said having a teacher speak to the class as a whole from the front was much more effective than children working on their own – the method which has become dominant in schools over the past 40 years. Mr Gibb’s intervention, which will infuriate many in the educational establishment, follows a Government scheme in which more than 70 maths teachers from British primaries went to Shanghai to study the teaching styles of their Chinese counterparts. Researchers have found that children in China achieve marks in maths up to 30 per cent higher than English pupils of the same age. In ‘whole class’ teaching, which was common in this country until the 1950s, the teacher instructs all the pupils together by using a blackboard, or its equivalent, while testing the children with questions. But progressive educationalists argued this was too authoritarian, and instead promoted the ‘child-centred’ approach that has been prevalent in primary schools since then. Under this system, pupils are encouraged to ‘discover’ knowledge by themselves, working at their own speed or in small groups, with the teacher offering them support. Mr Gibb told The Mail on Sunday: ‘I would like to see schools across the country adopt whole class teaching methods, particularly in maths and science. Research shows it is significantly more effective than other methods that concentrate more on personalised learning.’ He said Shanghai schools topped international league tables, with 15-year-olds there three years ahead of their English counterparts in maths. Mr Gibb added: ‘In Shanghai primary schools, whole class teaching with all pupils taking part in question and answer sessions is key to their success. All their pupils are taught the same curriculum and all are expected to reach the same high standard.’ Professor Alan Smithers, director of the Centre for Education and Employment Research at Buckingham University, said: ‘English education was overtaken with progressive ideas in recent decades, which held it was better for children to learn by themselves and at their own pace. ‘This was clearly madness, and it has taken 40 years to realise this. ‘The trouble with the trendy methods is that the children are left to their own devices, including chatting to their friends, while the teacher is elsewhere. It is a very inefficient use of time and resources.’ Mr Gibb’s comments have been backed by recent research, which concluded that the success of pupils in the Far East is largely down to teaching methods. Maths tests taken by 562 nine and ten-year-olds in classrooms in Southampton and Nanjing in China found that the Chinese pupils scored between 20 and 30 per cent higher than the English youngsters. Researchers also used video to analyse what was going on in lessons and found that in the Chinese classrooms – where pupils sit in rows of desks facing the front – ‘whole class interaction’ was being used 72 per cent of the time, compared with only 24 per cent in England. By contrast, the classes in England, where pupils are often grouped in clusters of desks, spent nearly half – 47 per cent – of their time in ‘individual or group work’, compared with 28 per cent in China. Prof Reynolds said he was disappointed that more schools were not increasing their use of the ‘whole class’ approach as it would improve results in most subjects.
|
為了學(xué)習(xí)傳統(tǒng)教學(xué)在中國(guó)取得的成功,英國(guó)教育大臣建議學(xué)校重拾“填鴨式”教學(xué)模式,這一教學(xué)方式曾經(jīng)也在英國(guó)風(fēng)行一時(shí)。 教育大臣尼克·吉布(Nick Gibb)說(shuō)道,讓一個(gè)老師在前面講課比學(xué)生自行學(xué)習(xí)更加有效。學(xué)生自主學(xué)習(xí)的模式在過(guò)去的40年中主導(dǎo)了英國(guó)學(xué)校教育。 吉布先生的這一提議將會(huì)激怒教育機(jī)構(gòu)的許多人士。不久前,英國(guó)政府曾安排70余名小學(xué)數(shù)學(xué)教師赴上海觀摩數(shù)學(xué)教學(xué),希望向中國(guó)“取經(jīng)”。 研究人員發(fā)現(xiàn),中國(guó)兒童取得的數(shù)學(xué)成績(jī)要比同齡的英國(guó)兒童高百分之三十。 這一“全班教學(xué)模式”,直到20世紀(jì)50年代在英國(guó)仍然很常見(jiàn),老師在上面用黑板板書(shū)上課,向?qū)W生提問(wèn)來(lái)測(cè)試他們的聽(tīng)課程度,所有學(xué)生坐在下面聽(tīng)老師講。 但是進(jìn)步教育工作者批駁道,這種模式太過(guò)于“獨(dú)裁”,并倡導(dǎo)實(shí)行自那時(shí)以來(lái)一直在小學(xué)教育中風(fēng)行的“以孩子為中心”的教育模式。這種體制,鼓勵(lì)學(xué)生自己去發(fā)現(xiàn)知識(shí),以他們自己的速度或小團(tuán)體合作來(lái)學(xué)習(xí)并輔之以老師的指導(dǎo)。 吉布告訴《每日郵報(bào)》說(shuō):“我想讓全國(guó)的學(xué)校采取全班教學(xué)的模式,尤其是在數(shù)學(xué)和科學(xué)的教學(xué)上面。研究表明,這一模式比其他的專注于個(gè)體學(xué)習(xí)的模式更加顯著有效。” 他說(shuō)上海的學(xué)校榮登國(guó)際排行榜榜首。上海十五歲的學(xué)生在數(shù)學(xué)教學(xué)上面,要比英國(guó)的同齡學(xué)生要先進(jìn)三年。 吉布補(bǔ)充說(shuō):“在上海的小學(xué)的全班教學(xué)模式中,所有的學(xué)生參與問(wèn)題回答是他們成功的關(guān)鍵。老師教授給所有的學(xué)生同樣的課程,以期他們獲得同樣高的水平。 白金漢大學(xué)(Buckingham University)教育與就業(yè)研究中心(Centre for Education and Employment Research)主任艾倫·史密瑟斯(Alan Smithers)教授說(shuō)道:“英國(guó)的教育在近幾十年中過(guò)于強(qiáng)調(diào)進(jìn)步的思想,而這種思想認(rèn)為通過(guò)兒童自己的方式學(xué)習(xí)更好?!?/p> “這顯然是瘋狂的,我們花了40年的時(shí)間才認(rèn)識(shí)到?!?/p> “這些時(shí)髦教學(xué)方法的問(wèn)題在于,孩子們的學(xué)習(xí)由他們自己來(lái)決定,他們可能會(huì)與朋友聊天,而老師卻在別的地方。這一方式?jīng)]有充分的利用時(shí)間和資源。” 吉布的言論得到了最近研究的支持,研究認(rèn)為,遠(yuǎn)東地區(qū)學(xué)生的成功在很大程度上就歸因于教學(xué)方法。 在一項(xiàng)由562名九至十歲的來(lái)自南安普敦(Southampton)和中國(guó)南京的學(xué)生參與的課堂數(shù)學(xué)測(cè)試中,發(fā)現(xiàn)中國(guó)學(xué)生的分?jǐn)?shù)要比英國(guó)學(xué)生的分?jǐn)?shù)高20%至30%。 研究人員還用視頻來(lái)分析課堂過(guò)程,他們發(fā)現(xiàn)在中國(guó)的課堂中,學(xué)生們排排坐,面對(duì)著黑板,72%的時(shí)間是用來(lái)課堂交流的,而相比英國(guó)的課堂只有24%的課堂交流。 相比之下,英國(guó)的課堂上,學(xué)生們分成幾個(gè)小組,他們用近一半的時(shí)間——47%的時(shí)間在‘個(gè)人或團(tuán)體討論活動(dòng)’中,中國(guó)的課堂只有28%的時(shí)間花費(fèi)在此之上。 研究者之一雷諾茲教授說(shuō),他很失望很多英國(guó)學(xué)校沒(méi)有充分利用“全班教學(xué)”方式,這種方式能提高大多數(shù)科目的學(xué)生成績(jī)。 (翻譯:旋轉(zhuǎn)木馬0930 編輯:Julie) 掃一掃,關(guān)注微博微信
|
|