|
Is it possible to tell how happy we all are?
Yes, according to US scientists who have devised a way to measure the happiness of millions of bloggers -- and found Michael Jackson's death was one of the saddest days while the U.S. election was the happiest in four years.
Peter Dodds and Chris Danforth, a mathematician and computer scientist from the Advanced Computing Center at the University of Vermont, have created a "sensor" to mine 2.3 million blogs and gather sentences beginning with "I feel" or "I am feeling." Each sentence is then given a happiness score from 1 to 9 depending on a point system allocated to 1,034 words. For example, "triumphant" averages 8.87 points, "paradise" 8.72, "pancakes" 6.08, and "suicide" 1.25.
They said this "hedonometer" showed that the US election day last November was the happiest day in four years with a spike in the word "proud" while the day of the "King of Pop's" death was one of the unhappiest.
"The proliferation of personal online writing such as blogs gives us the opportunity to measure emotional levels in real time," they said in their report titled "Measuring the Happiness of Large-Scale Written Expression: Songs, Blogs, and Presidents."
Their study, reported this week in the Journal of Happiness Studies, involved gathering nearly 10 million sentences.
"Our method is only reasonable for large-scale texts, like what's available on the Web. Any one sentence might not show much. There's too much variability in individual expression," said Dodds.
The scientists said that although blog writers tend to be younger and more educated than average, they were broadly representative of the US population.
They were also writing in a natural environment where they were comfortable as opposed to other happiness studies were participants were put on the spot.
"They think they are communicating with friends but (since blogs are public), we're just looking over their shoulders," said Danforth.
They said their results also ran contrary to recent social science data that suggested people basically feel the same at all ages of life.
Their method showed young teenagers are unhappiest with a disproportionate use of "sick," "hate," "stupid," "sad," "depressed," "bored," "lonely," "mad," and "fat." Then people get happier until they are old, when happiness drops off.
But the scientists said it was impossible to know what was really going on in people's heads.
"Our study is a data exploration," said Danforth. "It's not about developing a theory."
點擊查看更多雙語新聞
(Agencies)
|
有沒有可能分辨出我們到底有多高興呢？
答案是肯定的，因為美國的科學(xué)家已經(jīng)發(fā)明出測量數(shù)百萬博友快樂指數(shù)的方法，并發(fā)現(xiàn)邁克爾?杰克遜去世那天是博友們最傷心的日子之一，而美國大選之日則是他們四年來最開心的一天。
佛蒙特大學(xué)高級計算中心的數(shù)學(xué)家、計算機科學(xué)家皮特?道茲和克里斯?丹佛斯創(chuàng)造了一種“感應(yīng)器”，它能夠探測230萬博客，收集以“我覺得”或“我現(xiàn)在覺得”開頭的句子。每個句子根據(jù)配有1034個詞的計分系統(tǒng)得出快樂分?jǐn)?shù)，從1到9不等。例如，“勝利”這個詞的平均得分是8.87分，“天堂”的平均得分是8.72分，“煎餅”是6.08分，而“自殺”是1.25分。
他們說這一“快樂儀”顯示去年十一月份美國大選之日是四年來博友們最快樂的一天，因為“驕傲”這個詞高頻率地出現(xiàn)，而“流行天王”死亡那天則是博友們最傷心的日子之一。
“像博客這種個人網(wǎng)上寫作空間的迅速發(fā)展讓我們有機會即時測量情感的程度，”他們在題為《測量大范圍使用書面表達(dá)的快樂指數(shù)：歌、博客和總統(tǒng)》報告中說。
他們的研究收集了近1000萬個句子，研究報告在本周的《快樂研究》期刊中發(fā)表。
道茲說：“我們的方法只適用于大范圍應(yīng)用的文本，例如從網(wǎng)絡(luò)上可以找得到的詞句。任何一個單獨的句子可能都無法說明什么。因為在個體的表達(dá)中有太多的變數(shù)?！?/font>
兩位科學(xué)家說，盡管博客寫手可能比普通人群更年輕，受教育程度更高，他們卻能夠廣泛地代表美國民眾的聲音。
而且，和那些對參與者當(dāng)場進(jìn)行調(diào)查的其他快樂研究不同，這些博客寫手是在一種自然舒服的環(huán)境中寫作。
丹佛斯說：“他們以為自己是在和朋友交流，但是（因為博客是公開的），我們卻在他們背后觀看著一切?！?/font>
道茲和丹佛斯說最近的社會科學(xué)數(shù)據(jù)顯示人們在各個年齡階段的感覺基本上都差不多，而他們倆的調(diào)查結(jié)果卻與之相反。
他們的調(diào)查方法顯示出來的結(jié)果是青少年是最不快樂的，他們或多或少地使用“惡心”、“恨”、“愚蠢”、“悲傷”、“壓抑”、“無聊”、“孤獨”、“生氣”和“肥胖”這些字眼。而隨著年紀(jì)增長，人們會變得快樂一些，直到他們進(jìn)入老年，那時快樂指數(shù)又會下降。
但是兩位科學(xué)家說要知道人們的頭腦中到底在想什么是不可能的。
“我們的研究是一個數(shù)據(jù)上的調(diào)查，”丹佛斯說，“而不是要發(fā)展成一個理論?！?/font>
相關(guān)閱讀
研究：快樂會傳染
為何快樂的時間溜得快
到底什么是快樂?
男女快樂感有別 男愛錢女重情
英國兒童看世界：快樂最重要
（英語點津 陳丹妮編輯） |
