“我在預(yù)習(xí)滬教版英語(yǔ)教材時(shí)，發(fā)現(xiàn)95頁(yè)有點(diǎn)小問(wèn)題。95頁(yè)上有3張小昆蟲(chóng)的照片，按英文的說(shuō)明分別應(yīng)該是蝴蝶、螞蟻和蜜蜂。但是圖片上卻是蝴蝶、螞蟻和食蚜蠅……”

近日，沈陽(yáng)市126中學(xué)7年級(jí)學(xué)生崔宸溪把自己的發(fā)現(xiàn)反映給了上海教育出版社。

“I noticed a tiny mistake on page 95 of the English textbook published by Shanghai Educational Publishing House when I was preparing lessons before class,” said Cui Chenxi, a 7th grader in Shenyang No. 126 Middle School. Cui had found an illustration captioned as “bee” to actually be hoverfly in the picture.
沈陽(yáng)市第126中學(xué)七年級(jí)學(xué)生崔宸溪說(shuō)：“我在預(yù)習(xí)滬教版英語(yǔ)教材時(shí)，發(fā)現(xiàn)95頁(yè)有點(diǎn)小問(wèn)題?！彼l(fā)現(xiàn)一幅插圖的說(shuō)明是“bee（蜜蜂）”，實(shí)際上圖片上卻是蒼蠅。

An editor of the publisher on Friday confirmed the error they made after consulting a biology teacher and said it will rectify the mistake by replacing the wrong picture in a reprinted version after it gets approval from the Ministry of Education.
10月8日，在咨詢了一位生物老師后，出版社的一位編輯確認(rèn)了問(wèn)題的存在，他表示，在獲得教育部批準(zhǔn)后，將在重印版本中替換錯(cuò)誤的圖片，糾正錯(cuò)誤。

The editor also thanked the 12-year-old boy for reporting the error, and praised him for being “really professional”.
這位編輯還感謝了崔宸溪為他們糾錯(cuò)，并稱贊他“非常專業(yè)”。

When asked how he discovered the mistake Cui said, “It's simple. Bees have two pairs of wings while hoverflies have only one pair of functional wings and bees are plump with their round belly versus the hoverfly's slim figure. What's more, bees have distinct tentacles while those of hoverflies are obscure.”
當(dāng)被問(wèn)起是怎么發(fā)現(xiàn)教材有問(wèn)題時(shí)，小崔回應(yīng)：“其實(shí)也挺簡(jiǎn)單，蜜蜂有兩對(duì)翅膀、食蚜蠅只有一對(duì)，而且蜜蜂的肚子是胖胖的，食蚜蠅很瘦的。另外，蜜蜂的觸角很明顯，食蚜蠅的不明顯?！?/p>

記者從中國(guó)數(shù)字科技館的一篇科普文章中得知，區(qū)分食蚜蠅和蜜蜂的三大要點(diǎn)正是：①觸角長(zhǎng)短；②翅膀數(shù)量；③后腿的粗細(xì)。

As a young man who took an avid interest in biology, Cui had raised 10 types of ants in his primary school days in order to observe the insects' habits and their division of labor, according to Cui's mother.
據(jù)小崔的母親介紹，他對(duì)生物非常感興趣，小學(xué)時(shí)，他自己在家里養(yǎng)過(guò)10多種螞蟻，觀察他們的習(xí)性、種群內(nèi)的分工等。

The family stores more than 300 titles of books related to natural science and Cui has a bookshelf of his own. Having not attended a single one of the extracurricular training classes which parents are keen to put their kids in, the boy is happy to learn independently.
家里自然科學(xué)方面的書(shū)有300多本，他自己就有一個(gè)專門的書(shū)架；他獨(dú)立學(xué)習(xí)的能力很強(qiáng)，從沒(méi)有參加過(guò)家長(zhǎng)們推崇的課外培訓(xùn)機(jī)構(gòu)。

這次國(guó)慶節(jié)老師讓寫(xiě)個(gè)作文《這就是母親》，結(jié)果他寫(xiě)的是昆蟲(chóng)如何保護(hù)自己的卵。

網(wǎng)友們紛紛為小崔點(diǎn)贊，稱“學(xué)習(xí)有興趣才能走得更遠(yuǎn)”。

初中生指出歷史教科書(shū)錯(cuò)誤

這不是00后小朋友第一次發(fā)現(xiàn)教科書(shū)里的錯(cuò)誤。

此前，#上海一初中生指出歷史教科書(shū)錢幣錯(cuò)誤#話題沖上熱搜。

據(jù)了解，上海初中生顧則行翻看《中國(guó)歷史地圖冊(cè)》（第一冊(cè)）第41頁(yè)時(shí)，看到引用了兩枚古錢幣照片，文字標(biāo)注為“北魏孝文帝時(shí)期的銅錢太和五銖和宣和通寶”。

在他的記憶里，宣和通寶的“宣和”不是北魏孝文帝的年號(hào)，他立即上網(wǎng)查了宋徽宗、北魏孝文帝的年號(hào)，同時(shí)查閱其他古錢幣書(shū)籍，確認(rèn)“宣和通寶”是宋徽宗時(shí)期所造。

教材責(zé)編回應(yīng)，宣和通寶錢幣在孝文帝時(shí)期存在過(guò)，只是時(shí)間很短，將“宣和通寶”這枚古錢幣放在孝文帝時(shí)期確實(shí)有一點(diǎn)不妥。出版社會(huì)考慮在修改教材時(shí)將這一處圖文刪掉。

后生可畏！

編輯：左卓
來(lái)源：中國(guó)青年報(bào) 遼沈晚報(bào) 上海中學(xué)生報(bào)