近日，江蘇省消保委發(fā)布動(dòng)畫領(lǐng)域侵害未成年人成長安全消費(fèi)調(diào)查報(bào)告，報(bào)告稱在《熊出沒》《小豬佩奇》等21部中外動(dòng)畫片中，包含1465處易被模仿危險(xiǎn)點(diǎn)，包含陰暗黑化元素和強(qiáng)植廣告行為等。

The Consumer Rights Protection Committee in East China’s Jiangsu province published a report on Wednesday that said it had discovered 1,465 examples of objectionable behavior that could be harmful to children in 21 Chinese and foreign cartoons broadcast in China.
4月7日，江蘇省消保委發(fā)布報(bào)告稱，在中國播出的21部中外動(dòng)畫片中發(fā)現(xiàn)了1465處可能對(duì)兒童造成傷害的不良示范。

According to the survey results, there are several main things that parents are unhappy about in cartoons: depictions of violent crime, dangerous behavior that is easily imitated, dark and negative content.
調(diào)查結(jié)果顯示，家長對(duì)動(dòng)畫片中的以下幾點(diǎn)最為不滿：對(duì)暴力犯罪的描寫、易模仿的危險(xiǎn)行為、暗黑負(fù)面內(nèi)容。

The report listed some specific examples such as in the seventh episode of the English cartoon Peppa Pig, characters ride on a giant pumpkin that is being airlifted by a helicopter, which the committee considers dangerous as it may mislead children into thinking it is safe to climb high places.
報(bào)告列舉了一些具體的例子，例如，在英國卡通片《小豬佩奇》的第七集中，動(dòng)畫角色騎在一個(gè)直升機(jī)吊著的大南瓜上，委員會(huì)認(rèn)為這一鏡頭屬于危險(xiǎn)動(dòng)作，可能誤導(dǎo)孩子認(rèn)為攀爬高處是很安全的。

Some netizens remarked that they did not understand why these parents were making a fuss. However, there have been some incidents in which children have come to harm while imitating cartoons.
一些網(wǎng)友對(duì)家長們?yōu)楹稳绱舜篌@小怪感到不理解。但是，此前也確實(shí)出現(xiàn)過兒童模仿動(dòng)畫片而受傷的事件。

In March 2017, a five-year-old girl who was locked at home alone and left to watch cartoons suffered serious injuries after jumping from the 11th floor with an umbrella in imitation of a cartoon scene. Over in Northwest China’s Shaanxi Province, a 10-year-old girl cut off her younger sister’s nose with an electric saw in March 2016, after watching a similar scene in a cartoon.
2017年3月，一名被反鎖家中看動(dòng)畫片的5歲女童模仿動(dòng)畫場景，持傘從11樓跳下，造成重傷。2016年3月，陜西省一名10歲女童在看到動(dòng)畫中的類似場景后，用電鋸割下了妹妹的鼻子。

The report, based on a survey of parents in the province, has sparked numerous hot discussions on Chinese social media since its release, leading many netizens to once again call for the implementation of a rating system for TV and film content, while other netizens called for parents to supervise their children more instead of just blaming cartoons for any accidents that may occur.
這份報(bào)告基于對(duì)江蘇省家長的調(diào)查而來，自發(fā)布以來，在國內(nèi)社交媒體上引發(fā)熱議。許多網(wǎng)民再次呼吁對(duì)影視內(nèi)容實(shí)行分級(jí)制度，還有網(wǎng)民呼吁家長更多地監(jiān)督孩子，而不是僅僅把任何可能發(fā)生的事故的責(zé)任歸咎于動(dòng)畫片。

《揚(yáng)子晚報(bào)》的報(bào)道指出，對(duì)于家長而言，動(dòng)畫片成了哄孩子的“無奈選擇”。開放式的網(wǎng)絡(luò)平臺(tái)和家長“甩手式”的“放手教育”，無疑加大了兒童對(duì)不良信息的接觸面。

江蘇省消保委建議從兩個(gè)維度探索動(dòng)畫分級(jí)制度。一是從受眾年齡看，確定成年人和未成年人兩個(gè)基礎(chǔ)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，對(duì)成年動(dòng)畫內(nèi)容審查適度放寬。而在未成年人領(lǐng)域，需要進(jìn)行進(jìn)一步劃分，如0-2歲為嬰幼兒保護(hù)級(jí)別、3-6歲為學(xué)齡前兒童保護(hù)級(jí)別、7-12歲為學(xué)齡期兒童保護(hù)級(jí)別、13-18歲為青少年保護(hù)級(jí)別劃分。二是從動(dòng)畫內(nèi)容分級(jí)，如戰(zhàn)斗類別可能含有激烈的沖突行為、或者非日常用語、出現(xiàn)對(duì)常識(shí)的顛覆性描寫等內(nèi)容的，進(jìn)行限制級(jí)分類，在播放平臺(tái)，播放時(shí)間上進(jìn)行限縮管理；對(duì)涉及科普教育，日常生活類型的進(jìn)行普通級(jí)分類，在常規(guī)電視、網(wǎng)絡(luò)等平臺(tái)播放。

綜合來源：揚(yáng)子晚報(bào)，Global Times，觀察者網(wǎng)